A Pennsylvania County’s Election Day Nightmare Underscores Voting Machine Concerns
READ MORE
Election Day here had been injured by complaints of prolonged lines, glitch-prone hold screens and undone check workers. Voters opposite a county pronounced a knowledge serve eroded their already jarred certainty in a choosing process.
“It done me unhappy since with all that’s going on, we kind of worry about: Was something tampered with, or was it only a mistake,” pronounced Michelle Broadhecker, 48, of Easton, who pronounced her stress about elections began after 2016. “There’s only too most going on that we worry about those things. And we don’t wish a wrong people in a wrong places.”
Though there has been no decisive investigate as to what caused a machines to malfunction, as a machines are sealed divided for 20 days after an choosing according to state law, the prevalent speculation is that a hold screens were tormented by a bug in a software. A comparison comprehension central who focuses on choosing confidence pronounced there were no manifest signs of outward nosiness by any unfamiliar actors.
County officials who led a squeeze of a machines have argued that a complement indeed functioned as it should: The paper list backup routine worked. The hold screens failed, though a backups had a scold vote, so while it was inconvenient, it valid a prerequisite of a paper backup.
“We also need to concentration on a outcome, that is that voter-verified paper ballots supposing fair, accurate and authorised choosing results, as indicated by a county’s central formula stating and successful postelection risk-limiting audit,” pronounced Katina Granger, a spokeswoman for Election Systems Software, a manufacturer of a machines. “The choosing was authorised and fair.”
Article source: http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/21/europe/uk-may-brexit-speech-florence/index.html
Comments
Post a Comment